a) Abolitionists were everything from abusive to humanitarians, according to Potter. Holt, on the other hand, was a professor so he provided a more lucid interpretation of the Civil War, as a matter of fact, Holt sees the conflict as a breakdown in America's democratic political process.
b) Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
Answer: Sam Houston wanted peace for the natives Americans because he wanted to try to come to a agreement were the natives could move around Texas and the natives would be peaceful
hope this helps
-scav
Answer:
Muslims moved from east Punjab to west Punjab-Hindus moved from west Punjab to east Punjab.
Answer: The answer I would say is 10% or 15%!
Explanation:
I think I remember learning that.
Hope it's right!!!
