"Each congressional party has become more homogeneous, and the distance between parties has increased." This represents the trend of party polarization over the past three decades.
Political party polarization refers to cases in which an individual's stance on a given policy or issue is strictly defined by their identification with a particular political party.
The reasons for the rise in party polarization include political parties, redistricting, the public's political ideology, and the role mass media in spreading the information.
The congressional party are creating programs and policies that shape public opinions. Once the political party win the elections, they form the government and its policies are implemented.
Hence, over the past three decades, each congressional party has become more homogeneous, and the distance between parties has increased. This includes the expanding number of candidates in the party.
To learn more about the party polarization here:
brainly.com/question/11319360
#SPJ4
Answer:
A city mayor's office would have a ".gov" domain
Explanation:
Answer:
para ir de un país, región o lugar a otro. pasar periódicamente de una región o clima a otro, como ciertas aves, peces y animales: las aves migran hacia el sur en el invierno. cambiar de un sistema, modo de funcionamiento o empresa a otro. Fisiología.
No we ban them for protection purposes so that ordinary scientists and citizens cant get their hands on them and use them against our own populous
Answer:
<h3>Yes, society as Kurt Vonnegut imagines in his "Harrison Bergeron" could be read as symbolic of realities in our society today.</h3>
Explanation:
Vonnegut's story presents a future where the U.S Constitution has created a complete uniform society where every citizen is treated equally in every aspects of life. However, to achieve this feat, the government has abolished the principles of individuality and personal liberty.The government subdues any form of individual talent or intellectual abilities.
Vonnegut does not seem to distinguish any particular government here, but we can relate a similar case given the time when he has written this story. The story was published in 1961 which was during the time of Cold War. Perhaps through this story, he wanted to criticize the socialist or Marxian form of government emphasized by USSR.
The story revolves a government that tries to subdue any form of individualistic ideas or innovations. It contrast the tenets of capitalism and democracy where individual freedom and talented intellectuals are oppressed by the government.
Similarly, the control of media and oppression of freedom of speech and expression by governments are some symbolic realities in our society today. This is because the government tries to suppress any form of dissent or criticism against them. Individuals who opposes the government are usually forced into silence by imprisonment and other forms of threats.
