Answer:
Follows are the solution to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
This business of plastic containers is increasing its Lunchbox Product Signature price around $3.00 and $4.00. The volumes produced consequently declined around 20,000 to 15,000.
The price elasticity also becomes unitary
In point b:
U.S. economic theory states that the elasticity of fuel demand is 0.5 because prices would be less than 1 and so are non-elastic.
In point c:
The capital Metro agrees and add $2.00 to $2.21 also for bus fares. Consequently, with an average of 70,000 drivers a days to both a daily average 61,000 drivers, its passenger numbers who take the bus in Austin falls.
The value being higher than 1 is elastic.
the under-supply problem associated with free-riders and public goods can be solved by making the good or service more excludable
What is public goods ?
A public good is a good that is both non-excludable and non-rivalrous in economic terms. Users cannot be denied access to or use of such goods for failing to pay for them. Furthermore, use by one person neither prevents nor reduces the availability of others.
A public good is a commodity or service that is made available to all members of a society in economics. These services are typically administered by governments and funded collectively through taxation. Law enforcement, national defense, and the rule of law are examples of public goods.
Defense, lighthouses, streetlamps, and clean air are all examples of public goods. They are all non-exclusive and non-rivalrous in terms of the public good.
To know more about public goods follow the link:
brainly.com/question/25498461
#SPJ4
Answer:
the number of units started and completed in June is 24,900 units
Explanation:
The computation of the number of units started and completed in June is shown below;
= Opening work in process inventory + transferred units - ending work in process units
= 12,300 units + 16,900 units - 4,300 units
= 24,900 units
hence, the number of units started and completed in June is 24,900 units
Answer:
The differences between US GAAP and IFRS pose an extra cost because international corporations must prepare two separate accounting statements. But besides that, other potential risks include paying higher taxes than what the companies should pay int their home countries and the uncertainty generated by changing rules.
Not only do current tax rates affect potential investments, e.g. currently companies in the US pay relatively low corporate taxes (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) but these benefits end on 2025. But also different methods for valuating physical assets and R&D costs can represent higher than expected taxes. E.g. depending on a company's needs, it may be beneficial to expense all R&D costs right away, or maybe it would be better to capitalize some of them after technical feasibility is achieved (IFRS).
The main advantage of having uniform rules (e.g. UCC) is that all the companies know exactly what to expect and how to act. Certainty decreases risk, and less risk reduces costs.
Explanation:
In the US, the vast majority of firms use US GAAP as their accounting method, but around the world the IFRS method is used.
Physical asset valuation is the process of determining the value of your physical assets including P, P & E, and also inventories.
- When valuing inventories IFRS uses FIFO, while US GAAP allows FIFO, LIFO or weighted average costing methods. US GAAP also values inventory at lesser of cost or market value, while IFRS values inventory at lesser of cost or net realizable value.
- US GAAP uses the cost method to determine the historic cost of an asset, while IFRS uses basically the same method but does not include all the costs of location of the assets (e.g. cost of removing or clearing a facility).
- US GAAP recognizes non-monetary exchanges while IFRS doesn't.
- IFRS also allows the cost of asset to be revalued, which can result in unrealized gains or losses. The US GAAP only considers historic costs.
- There are also other minor differences regarding depreciation, disposals and impairment rules.
Research and development must be expensed right away under US GAAP, while IFRS basically requires the same, it allows some capitalization of development expenditures if certain criteria is met (technical feasibility is achieved).
Answer:
Explanation:
The main objective of cost accounting are ascertainment of cost, fixation of selling price, proper recording and presentation of cost data to management for measuring efficiency and for cost control and cost reduction, ascertaining the profit of each activity, assisting management in decision making process.
plz mark as brainliest
