Answer:
D
Explanation:
Well, I had to think about this one. It could have been A, but when I went over the definition of monstrous it meant a couple of things, one of them was large, the other one was horrible. Then I went to monstrosity. It only had one meaning large or unsightly. So I finally disclosed on D. I am very very very sorry if I got this wrong :(. Great luck. :D
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the forgone benefit that would have been derived from an option not chosen. In this case, the lost is the potential profit they might make, which is C.
Answer:
Im pretty sure the answer is 600 dollars.
Explanation:
I did the math, if im wrong though please tell me. But i hope i helped.
I believe the answer to that would be "B", "descriptive, yet brief."
Your question is incomplete because it not does not provide the options to choose from, which are the following:
It misuses a statistic to overstate the amount of crime committed in New York City.
It assumes that because one person commits a crime, others will do so as well.
It uses an incorrect appeal to the New York Police Department as an authority.
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Answer:
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Explanation:
In the passage, the speaker does not mention any other causes which may have lead to the reduction of crime in New York City, such as a rise in employment, education and better quality of life. As a consequence, the speaker takes for granted that the only reason for the decrease of the crime rate is the stop-and-frisk policy, which he or she believes should be continued.
