The introduction of the brown tree snake in the 1940s to the island of Guam has resulted in most of the island's native bird and lizard species have gone extinct locally.
The majority of the island's indigenous bird and lizard species perished locally as a result of the brown tree snake's (Boiga irregularis) unintentional introduction to Guam. Eliminating native pollinators, also had "cascading" ecological impacts, leading to the extinction of native plant species.
Due to its invasion of Guam and serious ecological and financial harm, this species of snake is desired. It will consume practically anything and is the reason why many local bird and lizard species have almost entirely disappeared (Invasive).
The venomous and aggressive brown tree snake quickly spread throughout the entire island of Guam since it lacks any natural predators there.
To learn more about predators refer to:
brainly.com/question/12410124
#SPJ4
<span> Ivan Allen, Jr., removed them
</span>
B is actually the only one that makes sense. It was all-out war, they wouldn't be concerned about trimming armies. There was no Geneva convention at the time, and they wouldn't ban new inventions in the middle of a war. And Germany didn't invent all these weapons.
But trench warfare was driving everyone mad with boredom and conditions were terrible. People were willing to try anything to break the stalemate.
The answer cannot be a because appointing all federal judges would lead to a very "one-sided" jurisdiction and promotes bias. It cannot be b either because the supreme court on average only accepts 80 cases a year though it receives thousands of requests. C is also incorrect because the supreme court does not practice "judicial restraint" it is actually known as "judicial review". The difference? The supreme court can only uphold and postpone a victim or<span> </span>defendants ruling until the court has come to the final decision. Therefor judicial restraint only represents a miniscule version of judicial review. So the answer is inevitably d.It determines whether any actions by the executive and legislative branches are unconstitutional. Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Habitualization describes how “any action that is repeated frequently becomes cast into a pattern, which can then be … performed again in the future in the same manner and with the same economical effort”
Explanation:
This is my own knoledage
Hope it helps
Put a thanks
Thank you