Answer:
oracles is the wisdom king that's a days
Explanation:
that's why
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
1)Post figurative culture : cultural change is gradual, socialization takes place by elder passing knowledge to their kids
2)Configurative culture: cultural change is rapid, adults socialize their children but the peers are more interactive with one another, hence becoming means of socializing for one another
3)Pre figurative culture: cultural change occurring so fast that children might be the ones teaching adults more than they teach them regarding culture knowledge.
Answer:
Quota sampling
Explanation:
Quota Sampling is a non-probability sampling method in which the population is divided in <u>mutually exclusive subgroups</u> and the items from each of the subgroups are <u>selected based on a proportion. </u>
<u></u>
In this example the households were divided into <u>two subgroups: single-person households and husband-wife households </u>(it is clear that this subgroups are mutually exclusive). Then, since 40% of all households are single-person and 60% are husband-wife, t<u>he researcher ask interviewers to collect information based on this proportion,</u> therefore, 40% of the interviews will be done with single-person households and 60% with husband-wife households. Thus, these interviews are done based on a proportion.
We can see that the example meets all the requirements for quota sampling and thus, it's an example of this type of sampling.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
