<u>Answer:
</u>
When the psychologist elaborated on how productivity in that particular case has nothing to do with ratings, the interviewer interpreted it in a wrong manner and put it up as good researchers cannot make good teachers.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The meaning of what the psychologist said was not taken as it is by the interviewer and was rather twisted due to confusion.
- The interviewer interpreted exactly the opposite of what the psychologist said because he could not understand the use of words made by the psychologist in a different manner.
The correct answer <em>"c. social identification with a group can increase ingroup favoritism."</em>.
In the Jigsaw classroom work, Aronson demonstrated that when a group formed of students from different backgrounds is created and each member shares a specific role, there is a reduction in prejudice and stereotyping. Additionally, subjects tended to improve their relationships within-groups and out-groups.
The cave experiment, two groups of individuals from a similar social background were formed and put into a competition between each other. After the tasks they were assigned, there was a clear increase in prejudice and in-group favoritism from members of both groups.
Both experiments had a different focus on the same issue, which was that social affinity increases behaviors of prejudice and stereotypes in regards to other groups.
The stamp act was when Parliament imposed a new tax on all American colonists and required them to pay a tax for on every piece of printed paper they used like legal documents, licences, newspapers, and even playing cards. They all had taxes included with them
I'm not for sure I understand the question.
