To answer the question, “When an issue creates disagreement among the states, how does federalism solve the problem?”:
1. The state is allowed to find a solution about the issue.
2. There are equal powers with the federal and states therefore it can go through a debate.
3. The Constitution decides which makes the federal powers are superior.
4. There will be specific rules of each of the states created by the government.
The heliocentric model was generally rejected by the ancient philosophers for three main reasons:
1) If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and orbiting around the Sun, then the Earth must be in motion. However, we cannot ``feel'' this motion. Nor does this motion give rise to any obvious observational consequences. Hence, the Earth must be stationary.
—————————————
2) If the Earth is executing a circular orbit around the Sun then the positions of the stars should be slightly different when the Earth is on opposite sides of the Sun. This effect is known as parallax. Since no stellar parallax is observable (at least, with the naked eye), the Earth must be stationary. In order to appreciate the force of this argument, it is important to realize that ancient astronomers did not suppose the stars to be significantly further away from the Earth than the planets. The celestial sphere was assumed to lie just beyond the orbit of Saturn.
—————————————
3)The geocentric model is far more philosophically attractive than the heliocentric model, since in the former model the Earth occupies a privileged position in the Universe.
<span>The stability of information over time is called its volatility. Hope this helps!!</span>
I think it’s make the nation’s laws. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
