Answer:
The answer is - Optimistic
Explanation:
Explanatory style is the way in which we explain the events that happen to us in our lives, either good or bad. There is the pessimistic explanatory style and the optimistic explanatory style.
The optimistic explanatory style are characterized by explanations for negative outcomes as being due to unstable, specific and external causes so we do not blame ourselves 100% for things that go wrong, and that the negative events will end soon and they would not let it affect too many aspects of their lives. While positive outcomes are seen as being due to stable, global and internal causes.
Lara is using optimistic explanatory style therefore she tends to have more positive explanatory style as she takes credit for positive experiences, believes that the good things will last and they will favorably affect other aspects of her life.
Answer:
1. I broke my promise of buying my younger one an Ice-cream when she recovered from her illness. I rather bought her a toy.
2. I lied about not knowing the whereabouts of a man who was to be punished for belonging to a particular religion.
Explanation:
1. The moral theory of utilitarianism will justify the first scenario. This theory states that an action or policy is right if it maximizes happiness or results in the greater good of society. The action I took in the first case resulted in the greater good of my sister because a cup of ice cream would not be healthy for her who was just recovering from an illness. Therefore, that decision was for her greater good.
2. The Deontology theory that states that having a morally justifiable intent is better than obtaining the right results will justify my action. For me, it was not morally right that a man should be punished for his religion and that superseded telling the truth about the man's whereabouts.
Answer:
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
<em>The tariff of 1828 caused economic hardship on the people of the south and caused them to be very angry and bitter.
</em>
<em>Explanation:
</em>
<em>The tariff of 1828 raise taxes on imported manufactured goods from Europe. The goal of this tariff was to protect the young manufacturing industry of New England. The result was that goods from Europe were more expensive. Because England could not sell as many goods to America they could not purchase as much of the agricultural products of the south.
</em>
<em>The south was hurt badly by these tariffs. They could not sell as much of their products losing money and they had to pay more for the manufactured goods they needed. Also they had to purchase manufactured goods from northern factories because of the shortage of imports.
</em>
<em>The south called the tariffs of 1828 the Tariffs of Abominations. The south clearly hated these laws which were designed to help the north at the expense of the south. John C. Calhorn of South Carolina called for the nullification of the laws claiming States rights over federal law, which would be echoed in the calls for succession from the union.</em>
True. Hopefully I answered your question
