In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
Answer:
maybe because they believed in him, they believed that the sun was a god
Answer: A.) the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.
Explanation:
I just took the test.
Answer
These behaviors might indicate a driver is taking more risks , not managing risk, or after drinking an alcoholic beverage
Explanation
These behaviors normally occurs to people who drive under the influence of alcohol or any other drug that affect your brain These drugs or the alcoholic influence makes a driver to be careless and end up driving recklessly which puts his life and the life of other road users at a high risk This is because he cannot manage any risk which might occur and may end up in an accident
