1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rasek [7]
3 years ago
6

What criticism did Jan Hus have about the Roman Catholic Church?

History
2 answers:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C) That the selling of indulgences to everyday citizens was a sinful practice.

The criticism that Jan Hus had about the Roman Catholic Church was that the selling of indulgences to everyday citizens was a sinful practice.

Jan Hus (1372-1415) was theologian from Czechoslovakia whose ideas were aimed to reform the Church. Indeed he was the precursor of the Bohemian Reformation in Medieval times. Hus believed that no pope or priest had the right to kill in the name of God or sell indulgences because that was cheating on people and represented a sin.

evablogger [386]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C. That the selling of indulgences to everyday citizens was a sinful practice

Explanation:

Jan Hus, was a Czech theologian and philosopher, rector of the Carolina University in Prague. As a reformer and preacher he is considered one of the precursors of the Protestant Reformation. His followers are known as Hussites. He died burned at the stake after being condemned for heresy at the Council of Constance.

Hus stated that the true Church was invisible and that all those who belong to the Church are its members. The Roman church has an eminent role, but it is not the true Church of Christ, since it taught that only Christ was the head of the Church. He preached that Jesus Christ was the true Stone and not Peter, and said that the pope, with his corruption and his many sins and errors that he taught to people, was the incarnation of the antichrist. Hus's criticisms are directed mainly at Antipope John XXIII, successor of Alexander V, to whom the King of Bohemia had given his obedience. To finance the war against Ladislaus, John XXIII promulgated the preaching of indulgences in Bohemia. The public demonstration of Hus caused the mistrust of the preachers sent by the antipope, which was mainly due to the fact that they were only interested in money and little to explain well the meaning of indulgences to the faithful.

You might be interested in
How would you describe the life in the court of suleiman the magnificent court
DochEvi [55]
The Europeans called him "The Magnificent," but the Ottomans called him Kanuni, or "The Lawgiver." The Suleymanie Mosque, built for Suleyman, describes Suleyman in its inscription as Nashiru kawanin al-Sultaniyye , or "Propagator of the Sultanic Laws." The primacy of Suleyman as a law-giver is at the foundation of his place in Islamic history and world view. It is perhaps important to step back a moment and closely examine this title to fully understand Suleyman's place in history.

The word used for law here, kanun, has a very specific reference. In Islamic tradition, the Shari'ah, or laws originally derived from the Qur'an , are meant to be universally applied across all Islamic states. No Islamic ruler has the power to overturn or replace these laws. So what laws was Suleyman "giving" to the Islamic world? What precisely does kanun refer to since it doesn't refer to the main body of Islamic law, the Shari'ah ?

The kanun refer to situational decisions that are not covered by the Shari'ah . Even though the Shari'ah provides all necessary laws, it's recognized that some situations fall outside their parameters. In Islamic tradition, if a case fell outside the parameters of the Shari'ah , then a judgement or rule in the case could be arrived at through analogy with rules or cases that are covered by the Shari'ah . This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah , Hanifism, so it is no surprise that Hanifism dominated Ottoman law.

The Ottomans, however, elevated kanun into an entire code of laws independent of the Shari'ah. The first two centuries of Ottoman rule, from 1350 to 1550, saw an explosion of kanun rulings and laws, so that by the beginning of the sixteenth century, the kanun were a complete and independent set of laws that by and large were more important than the Shari'ah . This unique situation was brought about in part because of the unique heritage of the Ottomans. In both Turkish and Mongol traditions, the imperial law, or law pronounced by the monarch, was considered sacred. They even had a special word for it: the Turks called it Türe and the Mongols called it Yasa . In the system of Türe and Yasa , imperial law was regarded as the essential and sacred foundation of the empire. When this tradition collided with the Islamic Shari'ah tradition, a compromised system combining both was formed.

The Sultanic laws were first collected together by Mehmed the Conqueror. Mehmed divided the kanun into two separate sets or laws. The first set dealt with the organization of government and the military, and the second set dealt with the taxation and treatment of the peasantry. The latter group was added to after the death of Mehmed and the Ottoman kanun pretty much crystallized into its final form in 1501. Suleyman, for his part, revised the law code, but on the whole the Suleyman code of laws is pretty identical to the 1501 system of laws. However, it was under Suleyman that the laws took their final form; no more revisions were made after his reign. From this point onwards, this code of laws was called, kanun-i 'Osmani , or the "Ottoman laws."

Hope this helps
4 0
2 years ago
Although they are often unpopular with the public and there are many complaints that government is too large, bureaucracies perf
Semmy [17]

Answer:

i dont know. IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!!

Explanation:

har har

4 0
2 years ago
Who is aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
sergey [27]
Russian novelist and historian, help spread global awareness of Gulag<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What allowed Peru to become one of the richest and most powerful Spanish colonies after the Spanish invasion in
Temka [501]

Answer:

It's location had an abundancy of valuable minerals.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A series of legislative acts passed under the Grant administration in 1870 and 1871 authorized federal
lawyer [7]
The D. Force acts a series of <span>legeslative</span> acts that <span>passedunder</span> the Grant administration in 1870 and 1871 authorized federal protection for black suffrage through the use of the Army against the Ku Klux Klan.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Wen Ti, an emperor of the _______ dynasty, looked to the Han dynasty for methods of control and order. Sui Tang Song Yuan
    15·1 answer
  • Who produced large quantities of steel very efficiently by buying and controlling iron ore deposits, steel mills, and rainroads
    15·1 answer
  • What was the main contribution of Susan B. Anthony in the suffrage movement?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did business leaders oppose government regulation of business
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed to tensions between Japan and the United States before World War II
    13·1 answer
  • Ancient egyptians explained the mysteries of nature as the actions of their many gods
    7·2 answers
  • What do think the space race was?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the wall street crash
    10·1 answer
  • What did the Mayans develop?<br><br> bow and arrow<br> horses<br> numbering system<br> clock
    15·2 answers
  • To what extent did ECONOMICS cause global conflict in the period 1900 to the Present?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!