While others civilizations were devoting huge amounts of time and resources to the rich, ... The ruins of two ancient cities, Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro (both in ... Similar seals with different animal symbols and writings have since been found throughout the region. ... This copy of the Rig Veda was written after the Vedic Age.
It was 'The Great Migration.'
"The Great Migration<span> was the movement of 6 million African-Americans out of the rural Southern United States to the urban Northeast, Midwest, and West that occurred between 1910 and 1970."</span>
Aztec Religious is one of the powerful Central Mexico primaries. They are known as Mexica. The Aztec religion is polytheistic.
<h3>What is the background of Aztec religion?</h3>
The Aztec/Mexica were not indigenous to central Mexico; they believed they had arrived from the north. They have divided the nine tribes and the Nahuatl language they speak.
They follow more than 200 hundred gods. They are divided into 3 categories, such as the sky and celestial beings, the rain and agriculture, and war and sacrifices.
Thus, the main god of the Aztec religion is Huitzilopochtli. They are also known as the sun and moon gods in the Aztec religion.
Learn more about Aztec Religious here:
brainly.com/question/16781302
#SPJ1
Answer:
Lin relied on aggressive moral tone, meanwhile proceeding relentlessly against British merchants in a manner that could only insult their government. The only lesson Lin drew from China’s humiliation was that it was necessary to learn more about these “barbarians” and to import their technology. He could neither comprehend the implications of the European challenge nor overcome the weakness and conservative opposition of his contemporaries. Later, the so-called Self-Strengthening Movement adopted Lin’s program of reform; still later generations of revolutionaries abandoned Chinese culture in order to save China but accepted Lin as a national hero because of his courage and example in opposing the British.
.
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
