M<1 = 360 / 3 = 120
m<2 = 120/2 = 60
m<3 = 180 - 90 - 60
m<3 = 30
answer
30 (third choice)
Answer:
not enough info
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Let F = Fran's income
Let W = Winston's income
Combined income is 80000 ==> F + W = 80000
One quarter of Winston's income is the same as one-sixth of Fran's income ==>
(1/4)*W = (1/6)*F
Multiply the 2nd equation by 12 to clear the fractions
3*W = 2*F
Solve this equation for F
F = (3/2)*W
Substitute this value for F into the 1st equation
(3/2)*W + W = 80000
(5/2)*W = 80000
W = (2/5)*80000 = 32000
So F = 80000 - 32000 = 48000
So Winston earns 32000 and Fran earns 48000
Check: One quarter of Winston's income is 32000/4 = 8000
One sixth of Fran'e income is 48000/6 = 8000
Step-by-step explanation: Hope this helps
Answer:
40 is the answer . is it right or Not?
Answer:
<h2>The constant growth valuation formula is not appropriate to use unless the company’s growth rate is expected to remain constant in the future.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
The value of a stock can be calculated with the <em>constant growth valuation formula</em>, but it's mandatory that the stock has to have a constant growth, because it depends on this rate. Actually, the present value of a stock is calculated with this formula <em>when it can be assumed that its growth is constant.</em>
On the other hand, if the stock value is zero, if it has no growth at all, then, this formula can't be applied, because this variable will be missing.
If you see the image attached, you're gonna look for <em>'g'</em>, which represents the growth rate.