1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
8

An aggrieved woman can really complaint about the sexual harassment is it true or false ​

Law
2 answers:
Anvisha [2.4K]3 years ago
8 0
If the women has a history of being aggressive then it would change the story a little bit
Drupady [299]3 years ago
6 0
Depends on the situation does the women has a history of being aggressive
You might be interested in
If you need to park your vehicle beside a highway,
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

its A

Explanation:

because you must be out of other cars way

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is blue spelled backwards
astra-53 [7]

the answer is Eulb. that is blue spelled backwards

7 0
3 years ago
As cities grew in the eighteenth century, overcrowding increased along with crime rates,
masha68 [24]

Answer:

People whn hear the word crime thy r scared especially rich people because thy have many thgs so i think in 18th century the crime of stealing was da most because people were unemployed and wanted food to eat so thy would steal from rich people

4 0
3 years ago
The LDF attorneys hoped that the arguments set forth in the Boykin v. Alabama brief would eventually become the basis for the de
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna

Explanation:

In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.

By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.

6 0
3 years ago
Using an amount of force that is beyond that which is reasonably necessary.
lora16 [44]

Answer:

The amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. A person is generally justified in using force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm if the person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

Explanation:

Use of force. Hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Por qué consideras que son diferentes las células de un organismo a otro​
    14·1 answer
  • What is law.what is constitutional law and mercantille law
    9·1 answer
  • You are oh the train station writing for your trai. To arrive. You see a vending machine from where you can buy snacks and chips
    7·1 answer
  • TEXAS SERVANT GIRL MURDERS
    6·1 answer
  • Connie Hargrave's tree fell in the last storm and damaged the car of her neighbor, Andy Collin. Connie did not have insurance th
    12·1 answer
  • Tổng quát về hoạt động lập pháp của Singapore. So sánh với hoạt động lập<br> pháp của Việt Nam.
    12·1 answer
  • Define proto<br>please help​
    15·2 answers
  • Pros and cons of euthanasia
    9·1 answer
  • T
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not considered a “victimless” crime against society?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!