I think it’s because of trump. The white and congress said we were gonna get it and we didn’t because of how it is set up
Detective, sergeant, inspector, police commissioner
Answer: Treason, bribery, and other high crimes.
Explanation:
A remedy whereby a court orders a change in a written document to reflect what it ought to have said in the first place is known as what reformation.
<h3>What is reformation?</h3>
This is when there is an alteration to an already tendered document in a court so that it can show the true picture of events. The purpose of rectification is to make amendment of legal document due to mistakes made by the parties involved.
In other words, rectification in contract law takes place when a court demands a modification in a contract so that the contract states what it should have stated originally.
- Reformation may be granted in cases in which the instrument sought to be rectified constitutes the only agreement between the parties but does not reflect their common intention.
- It is is available if the parties intended to give effect to the whole of initial agreement in the written contract.
Learn more about reformations here: brainly.com/question/894611
#SPJ1
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.
Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;
-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and
-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.
The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.
On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or
-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults
#SPJ4
