1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kazeer [188]
3 years ago
9

Endangered species in Oklahoma are most at risk for extinction as a result of __________.

History
1 answer:
Dmitrij [34]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

hunting

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did planters fill the need for large numbers of workers on sugar plantations? A. with captured Africans who were brought as
Julli [10]
A. with captured Africans who were brought as slaves

During that time period, certain African group leaders would conquer other African tribes and sell the members as slaves to Europeans, who then sold them to colonists in the Americas.  These kidnapped Africans were then used to fill the need for labor on plantations, including sugar, in the Americas.
3 0
3 years ago
The US immigrant population in 1910 was
IrinaK [193]

The US immigrant population in 1910 was  more culturally diverse than in the 1800s.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

In 1900s, more and more immigrants from different parts of the world and especially Europe started to settle in America. Most of these immigrants settled in New York with an aim to find jobs and earn a living. American society in 1900s was full of diverse cultures and also depicted unity in diversity wherein all immigrants were incorporated in the society. American society in 1900s consisted of native America,s Latin Americans and Europeans who had mainly come from Southern and Eastern Europe.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hayek is best known for his contribution to the understanding of __
Oliga [24]

1- price changes

2- inflation; negatively

3- could not

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
What's accomplishments for Christopher Columbus?
zlopas [31]
He is best known for d<span>iscovering North America</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why are secondary sources important to the study of history? These sources include bones and weapons. These sources provide info
    7·2 answers
  • Was bill clinto a republican when he was president of the united states?
    13·1 answer
  • Most subcultures do not reject all of the values and practices of the larger society./4526269/6e5e7ffe?utm_source=registration
    6·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the 13 amendment​
    13·1 answer
  • What does this quote mean: The glory of eighteenth century France was built on backs of common man
    13·1 answer
  • Em um sistema de governo monarquico hereditario e aristocratico,que grupo social exerce o poder ?
    8·1 answer
  • According to the Theodor de Bry engraving of Spanish activities in the Americas, how did the Spanish act toward Native Americans
    9·1 answer
  • What were the characteristics of warfare during world war 1​
    13·1 answer
  • Which European country was not one of the major areas of migration?
    9·1 answer
  • What factors made it possible for Kush to conquer Egypt?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!