Respond to all parts of the question. In your response, use substantive examples where appropriate. Education plays a crucial ro
le in providing opportunity for citizens and advancing American society. Most education policy is made at the state and local levels, which restricts the federal government's role in education to providing supplemental funding for educational programs. At some point, however, the federal government expanded its role by setting requirements for schools to meet certain standards in order to receive federal financial support. Using your knowledge of how federalism affects policy making, develop an argument on whether the federal government's role in education should be expanded. Use at least one piece of evidence from one of the following foundational documents: The Federalist 10 Brutus 1
Given that we live in a federative republic, where state and local governments must share responsibility with the federal government, I believe that the role of the federal government in education should not be expanded, but the role of state and local governments. This is because the federal government knows the educational needs of the national territory in a generalized way, and may not, in fact, meet the needs of each region. However, state and local governments know this need in a more specific and complete way, in this case, the increase in the roles of this government with education can be much more profitable and advantageous than the increase in the role of the federal government.
The family systems<span> theory is particularly useful in dealing with a developmental and cultural crisis. The theory suggests that people can't be judged or interpreted in isolation, but as part of a family system as an emotional unit.
