Answer:
b. Lie detector tests necessarily require people to tell intimate details about private issues unrelated to the question at hand.
Explanation:
Elaine may hesitate to take the test because lie detector tests necessarily require people to tell intimate details about private issues unrelated to the question at hand.
When taking the lie detector test, there are control questions which are designed to control for the effect of the generally threatening nature of relevant questions. These control questions may sometimes be private issues or topics that may dent the test takers image even though they pass the test for the particular crime they are suspected of. This a reason why even innocent individuals are hesitant to take the test. For example Elaine may be asked if she has stolen from a previous employee before, even though this does not affect the question at hand, a positive response to that question will dent Elaine image in the organization even though she passes the test on embezzlement.
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer:
Producers
Explanation:
Because the reason is that a producer market is a place where the users directly reach the supplier without any involvement of any body is a producer market. So here the market is more dependant on the customers who interact with the main producer to get products at a lower prices.
You can add where it came from
You are referring to the famous cartoon titled "King Andrew the First" (1833), which shows President Jackson as a tyrannical and abusive monarch who rules without consulting anybody and exceeds his power. He is humorously depicted holding a scepter and a "veto" in each one of his hands, and his feet are symbolically stepping on the United States Constitution and the coat of arms of Pennsylvania.
This caricature relates to an event known as the "Bank War," a campaign led by President Jackson to block the renewal of the Second National Bank (which was located in Philadelphia) without the consent or the approval from Congress. Jackson, who was suspicious of the bank's operations and management, first vetoed a bill to recharter the Bank in 1832, and one year later he ordered the removal of federal funds from the said institution - which were given to various state banks - and the prohibition to make deposits in it.
