The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
I'd most likely say A, though they did discriminate since they were fighting this large-scale war, especially against the Japanese. But because this war was going on, they needed as much labor as possible. This was so they could have as much produced as possible, such as weapons and such.
I'm not sure if this is correct, so I'm sorry if it's wrong, but it'd be the one I choose.
Have a good day!
Hawaii was its own independent nation under rule of a monarchy it was later forcefully annexed because of suggestions from people such as Dole so they could gain more sales in the US
<span>Olney claimed that the Monroe Doctrine gave the U.S. authority to mediate border disputes in the Western Hemisphere. Olney extended the meaning of the Monroe Doctrine, which had previously stated merely that the Western Hemisphere was closed to additional European colonization.</span>
