Answer:
d. The first statement more likely uses emotive language and the second is more likely a fact.
Explanation:
The statement of the leader of the political rivalry includes highly emotional language that may or may not be accurate in describing reality. Even if it was true that farmers are suffering, the politician is likely exagerating the claims in order to rile up his supporters.
The statement of the economist is a fact. The economist is citing evidence, and is not expressing an opinion on the subject matter.
The shape of the contitintes*
