Earl of Rosslyn felt that parents are responsible for the protection, healthcare and safety for their children and thus he did not see any justification in the legislation that could protect the children.
Explanation:
He stated that there is no other law or person who can protect the children than their parents. Parents are the creator and supporters of their children and thus in this regard there is no need to see who can safeguard the children better than the parents.
This act was hated by the business industry because it was a general trade embargo on all foreign nations that was enacted by the United States Congress. ... During the Napoleonic Wars, rival nations Britain and France targeted neutral American shipping as a means to disrupt the trade of the other nation.
Answer:
Texas quickly became more urban than rural and Texans responded to the call for troops in great numbers.
Explanation:
Hope that helped!!!
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
