A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Answer:
it spread thoughts and beliefs and people relized that it was ok
Explanation:
Answer:
b would be the closest for 2
3 would be the United States of America.
Explanation:
That was the main thing they needed for farming and cultivation. Also it helped grow their population by keeping a steady source.
1. i am not writing a paragraph for you but this will help
the locomotive helped northern industries grow because it helped americans to get goods from other nations/places
i hope i did good
