Answer:
The answer is: rebuild its own competitive advantages
Explanation:
Core competencies give a company their competitive advantages, but as time goes on they tend to become core rigidities (e.g. Kodak's competitive advantage was based on its photographic film, but technology made affordable digital cameras available and Kodak went bankrupt).
Every company must rebuild their competitive advantages to adapt them to changing scenarios, cultures and technologies (e.g. Coke, Diet Coke and Coke Zero).
Freulia Inc. has to develop or modify their competitive advantages to keep doing business.
Answer:
Distribution channels
Explanation:
Distribution channels are made up of intermediary organisations that facilitates movement of goods between the suppliers and the consumers.
They are made up of wholesalers, distributors, and retailers.
They function by making a payment mechanism available to the supplier. Products are purchased and they are now made accessible to the consumer.
The main question distribution channels answers is - How do the products get to the customer?
Answer:
option (B) 0.012634
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Expected return Probability
16.5% 80%
-11.6% 20%
Now,
Mean return = ∑( Probability × Expected return )
= ( 0.8 × 16.5% ) + ( 0.2 × (-11.6%) )
= 13.2% - 2.32%
= 10.88%
Thus,
Variance = ∑(Probability × [ Expected return - Mean return ]² )
= 0.8 × ( 16.5% - 10.88% )² + 0.2 × ( -11.6% - 10.88% )²
= 0.8 × ( 5.62% )² + 0.2 × (-22.48%)²
= 0.8 × 0.0562² + 0.2 × 0.2248²
= 0.002526752 + 0.010107008
= 0.01263376 ≈ 0.012634
Hence,
The correct answer is option (B) 0.012634
Answer:
-4.25%
Explanation:
purchase price in 1999 = $12,497,500
purchase price in 2003 = $10,371,500
annual rate of return = {[($10,371,500 - $12,497,500) / $12,497,500] / (2003 - 1999)} x 100 = (-0.170114 / 4) x 100 = -4.25%
the annual rate of return refers to how much money you win or loss with an investment during a year. In this case, the investor lost $2,126,000 in 4 years, which resulted in a total loss of 17.01% for the whole period.
Answer:
d. even if Ichiro was only slightly at fault.
Explanation:
If Ichiro is suing Heather for negligence, but he himself is found to have negiglent as well, his possibilities of winning the case are less even if he was only slightly at fault.
This is because the fact that he was negligent as well reduces his condition of victim, and makes him an active participant in the accident. In other words, if Ichiro is found negligent, it means that the accident and his subsequent injuries were also his fault.
