Answer:
Yes, there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No ;
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 1000
x = 545
Phat = x / n = 545/1000 = 0.545
H0: p ≤ 0.5
H1: μ > 0.5
The test statistic :
(phat - p0) ÷ √(p(1 - P0) / n)
Test statistic :
(0.545 - 0.5) ÷ √(0.5(0.5) / 1000)
0.045 / 0.0158113
Test statistic = 2.846
α = 0.01
Decison :
Reject H0 ; if Pvalue < α
Using the Pvalue from Test statistic (Z) calculator :
Pvalue = 0.002214
With Pvalue < α ; We reject H0 and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No, making generalization about all women would not be reasonable as the data employed for the research mainly focuses on a particular
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
c. (18.5-17)/.9= 1.66666666667= 1.6667
d. .7107
e. .2185
f. 0.675=(x-17)/.9 x= 17.6075
Answer:
Number 3 is correct.
129.19m
Step-by-step explanation:
You might be wondering how did I got 32⁰, well, that's because they are alternate angles.
Now, we're trying to find the opposite side of the triangle.
Using the laws,
we got cos32⁰=x/243.8
243.8cos32⁰=x
129.19⁰
Mark me as Brian list?
