Part A: The slope of f(x) is three times as great as the slope of g(x).
Part B: The y-intercept of g(x) is 12 larger than the y-intercept of f(x).
In order to find these two answers, you need to find a model for f(x). You can do that by first finding the slope. The formula is below.
slope (m) = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
In this equation (x1, y1) is the first point and (x2, y2) is a second point. For this purpose, we'll pick (1, 0) and (0, -6)
slope (m) = (-6 - 0)/(0 - 1)
m = -6/-1
m = 6
Now we know that the slope is 6, which is 3 times as great as the first slope. Now to find the y-intercept, we can use either point and the slope in slope intercept form.
y = mx + b
0 = 6(1) + b
0 = 6 + b
-6 = b
So we know the y-intercept is -6, which is 12 less than the y-intercept of g(x).
Answer:
He simplified the x coefficients incorrectly
Step-by-step explanation:
You have two triangles, ADC and ABC.
Sides AD and AB are congruent.
Sides DC and BC are congruent.
Side AC is congruent to itself.
By SSS, triangles ADC and ABC are congruent.
Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent.
That means that angles DAC and BAC are congruent.
Angles DCA and BCA are congruent.
Since m<DAC = 32, then m<BAC = 32
Since m<DCA = 41, then m<BCA = 41.
Now you know the measures of two angles of triangle ABC.
The measures of the interior angles of a triangle add to 180.
You can find the measure of angle B.
m<BAC + m<B + m<BCA = 180
32 + m<B + 41 = 180
m<B + 73 = 180
m<B = 107
Answer:
It's not possible to reach a conclusion about who will vote candidate Taylor because this is a random sample and not a population census or experiment.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is impossible to reach a conclusion about the proportion of all likely voters who plan to vote for candidate Taylor because the 1,000 likely voters in the sample represent only a small fraction of all likely voters in a large city.
Answer:
I think it can be 3 . Hope it help you
