Answer:
A) social exchange theory.
Explanation:
In sociology and psychology, the social exchange theory refers to the process by which we take decisions analyzing the risks and benefits of our behavior and, after this analysis, we act according to it. In other words, we act to maximize benefits and minimize costs, so if something seems to "cost" a lot to us and doesn't give us too many benefits, we won't do it.
In this example, Katya donated money to a religious charity in order to boost her self-esteem while Jennifer is not donating money because she is fearful she might run out of money. We can see that they both analyze the costs and benefits of this action.<u> For Katya, the benefits are higher (boost of self-esteem) than the costs; while for Jennifer, the risks are too much (running out of money) </u>and therefore these differences are best explained in terms of the social exchange theory.
Answer: India's hockey team is the most successful team ever in the Olympics, having won eight gold medals. India emerged as champions at the games in 1928, 1932, 1936, 1948, 1952, 1956, 1964, 1980.
Explanation:
Hope This Helps!!! : )
Have A Good Day/Night And Keep On Smiling!!! : )
Answer:A.availibility heuistic
Explanation:When someone is trying to make a decision or understand something , they will sometimes use a shortcut to make conclusion in availability heuristic someone uses a number of related events or situations that quickly comes to mind in order to make a conclusion about a particular situation. This information that quickly comes to mind makes a person conclude that these situations are likely and more frequent than other situations hence they overestimate their probability and likelihood.
A speech community is a group of people who share a set of linguistic norms and expectations regarding the use of language.[1]
Exactly how to define speech community is debated in the literature. Definitions of speech community tend to involve varying degrees of emphasis on the following:
Shared community membershipShared linguistic communication
Early definitions have tended to see speech communities as bounded and localized groups of people who live together and come to share the same linguistic norms because they belong to the same local community. It has also been assumed that within a community a homogeneous set of normsshould exist. These assumptions have been challenged by later scholarship that has demonstrated that individuals generally participate in various speech communities simultaneously and at different times in their lives. Each speech community has different norms that they tend to share only partially. Communities may be de-localized and unbounded rather than local, and they often comprise different sub-communities with differing speech norms. With the recognition of the fact that speakers actively use language to construct and manipulate social identities by signalling membership in particular speech communities, the idea of the bounded speech community with homogeneous speech norms has become largely abandoned for a model based on the speech community as a fluid community of practice.
A speech community comes to share a specific set of norms for language use through living and interacting together, and speech communities may therefore emerge among all groups that interact frequently and share certain norms and ideologies. Such groups can be villages, countries, political or professional communities, communities with shared interests, hobbies, or lifestyles, or even just groups of friends. Speech communities may share both particular sets of vocabulary and grammatical conventions, as well as speech styles and genres, and also norms for how and when to speak in particular ways.
The Model Parliament is the term, attributed to Frederic William Maitland, used for the 1295 Parliament of England of King Edward .