The correct answer are
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
When the premises serve to support the conclusion's accuracy and effectiveness in a reasonable manner, the argument is said to be valid.
Options B, C, and D would all be acceptable arguments presented by the plaintiffs. Because there is a risk that they may be erroneous as well (as in inductive reasoning).
"The premises are likely to be true," Because the premises and conclusion are inversely related if the premises support the conclusion, it is regarded as true, and if not, the opposite is true.
Because the conclusion follows the premises logically, it is also known as a chain of reasoning. As a result, answers B, C, and D are appropriate.
Learn more about plaintiffs
brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ4
Correct Question
Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes.
A) The premises are not true all of the time.
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
