5th Amendment Right of Persons,
FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
a motive is not an element of a crime
Answer:
D. National Incident-Based Reporting System.
Explanation:
The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) is a program of the federal government of the United States of America that was launched in 1929.
The main purpose of the UCR is to gather and compile informations on crimes that were committed and reported to the law enforcement agencies in the United States of America.
Generally, the federal bureau of intelligence (FBI) are saddled with the responsibility of publishing these crime statistics reports in the United States of America.
This ultimately implies that, the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) measures the most serious crimes in the United States of America, also referred to as Part I crimes.
The new redesigned Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) is called the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). It took a five (5) year redesign effort to transform the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program into the more comprehensive and well-detailed National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
Answer:
In a common law jurisdiction, the property that the defendant is guilty of larceny is the lawnmower.
Explanation:
Larceny or theft is the intentional possession of someone's property for the purpose of permanently depriving the owner of its use. The property may be the person's identity, intellectual property, services, and personal property. Though the automobile was totally ruined, the neighbor did not initially intend to dispossess the owner of the car. But he intended to dispossess the owner of the lawnmower since he was about to trade it in for a new one, which will belong to him and not the former owner.
