1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
15

Use your knowledge of the definitions of validity, soundness, strength, and cogency to determine which of the following statemen

ts are true. Check all that apply. A statement is either valid or invalid. If an inductive argument is weak, then the argument's premises cannot all be true. All valid deductive arguments are equally valid. If a deductive argument's premises are not all true, then you know that the argument must be unsound. If an inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion, then the conclusion still could be strong, as long as the conclusion is unlikely to be false. An inductive argument cannot be both strong and uncogent. Some inductive arguments are stronger than others. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound. In a cogent inductive argument, the conclusion is probably true. It is possible for an inductive argument to be both uncogent and strong. If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then you know that the argument is sound. Some inductive arguments are both strong and weak. If a deductive argument is unsound, then the argument's premises must all be false. In a valid deductive argument it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false simultaneously. A cogent argument that has a large degree of inductive strength could still have a conclusion that is actually false.
Social Studies
1 answer:
emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The true statements are:

1. A statement is either valid or invalid.

False

2. If an inductive argument is weak, then the argument's premises cannot all be true.

True

3. All valid deductive arguments are equally valid.

True

4. If a deductive argument's premises are not all true, then you know that the argument must be unsound.

True

5. If an inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion, then the conclusion still could be strong, as long as the conclusion is unlikely to be false.

False

5. An inductive argument cannot be both strong and uncogent.

True

6. Some inductive arguments are stronger than others.

True

7. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound.

True

8. In a cogent inductive argument, the conclusion is probably true.

False

9. It is possible for an inductive argument to be both uncogent and strong.

False

10. If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then you know that the argument is sound.

True

11. Some inductive arguments are both strong and weak.

False

12. If a deductive argument is unsound, then the argument's premises must all be false.

True.

13. In a valid deductive argument it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false simultaneously.

True

14. A cogent argument that has a large degree of inductive strength could still have a conclusion that is actually false.

True

Explanation:

A statement is either true or untrue.  A statement cannot be valid or invalid.  Validity, soundness, strength, and cogency apply to arguments and not to statements.  When one makes a valid argument, it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

You might be interested in
A study that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. The researcher wants to add an adolescent populatio
stepladder [879]

The correct answer is: <em>"Unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review."</em>

According to the rules published by the IRB regarding the applicability of the Expedited Review, this extends to all individuals, regardless of their age. This condition will not change unless the research involves activities or circumstances that increase the level of risk to human subjects to a level higher than minimal.

6 0
3 years ago
The anti-federalist biggest argument against ratification of the constitution was that
amm1812

Answer:

They did not wanted the central government to abuse their authority.

Explanation:

The initial draft of the constitution was created to ensure that the citizens of United States have the highest power within the government. The founding fathers analyze the weaknesses of monarchy system (which was the dominant system back then) and purposefully designed the constitution to fix those weaknesses by reducing the power of the central government.

But, a group called the Federalist appear and advocated for the change of the initial draft of the constitution. They believed that the initial draft make the central government became very inefficient. The anti-federalists opposed this and  believed that the initial draft of the constitution was created to balance the power of the states and central government. They fear that if they made any change/ratification to this initial draft, that balance will be disrupted.

7 0
2 years ago
Choose one type of family. what are the possible advantages and disadvantages of this type of family?
sergejj [24]
<span>-Family can help take care of the child
-family can offer help and advice
-there is a close family bond
-they always have someone to talk to
-grandparents see their grandchildren growing up
-children have cousins to play with</span>Disadvantages of an extended family<span>-family may interfere or take care
-lack of privacy and space
-too many visitors
-disagreement on how to bring up the children</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements about how emotion plays a part in negotiation is accurate? Select one: a. Negotiations only cr
lara [203]

The correct answer is letter C.

Explanation: Negotiation resolve conflicts and achieve satisfactory outcome to disputes.

Even so, those who do not position themselves properly can lose opportunities, money and positive experiences.

Negotiation is a process of communication, which usually starts from the need to align conflicting interests.

4 0
2 years ago
Why do we not want to use atomic bombs​
lakkis [162]

Answer:

Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war. Still, others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.

Explanation:

i love this question.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An individual license will automatically terminate immediately upon the death of the licensee or if the license has not been ren
    6·1 answer
  • __________ describes the total number of coprime numbers; two numbers are considered coprime if they have no common factors.
    12·1 answer
  • For the most part, u.s. correctional leaders agree that jails do quite a lot for inmates who have mental, emotional, or alcohol-
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following illustrates belief perseverance?A. your belief remains intact even in the face of evidence to the contrar
    9·1 answer
  • Jesus' healings are a sign that the Father's plan of salvation is being fulfilled by
    9·1 answer
  • 6. When did humans first appear? (name the period)
    7·1 answer
  • Why did some people oppose the 17th Amendment?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of Canadian Human Rights Act?
    11·1 answer
  • Giving brainliest for correct answer page 175​
    8·1 answer
  • Background Essay
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!