Answer:
$1,107,793.41
Explanation:
The value of the payment today can be ascertained using the present value of an annuity due formula since the first payment is immediate as shown thus:
PV=monthly payment*(1-(1+r)^-n/r*(1+r)
monthly payment=$12,500
r=monthly interest rate=6.48%/12=0.0054
n=number of monthly payments in 10 year=10*12=120
PV=$12,500*(1-(1+0.0054)^-120/0.0054*(1+0.0054)
PV=$12,500*(1-(1.0054)^-120/0.0054*(1.0054)
PV=$12,500*(1-0.524003627
)/0.0054*1.0054
PV=$12,500*0.475996373
/0.0054*1.0054
PV=$1,107,793.41
Decrease the supply of credit ...
Below are the choices that I manage to check from other source:
A.Standard errors
B.Interval widths
C.Z-statistic
D.<span>Both b and c
The answer is D which is </span>Both b and c.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you.
Answer:
The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn.
Explanation:
Option A “The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn” is more accurate because the expected return is calculated by multiplying the risk premium with beta value and then adding with risk-free return. However, if the beta value is high, then the magnitude after multiplying with the risk premium will be high. Moreover, is magnitude will be added to risk-free return to find the expected return. Thus, it can be seen that Kaskin has high beta 1.2 as compared to Quinn’s beta value 0.6. So, the Kaskin has a higher expected return.
That means that she is going to have to work harder to be the best lawyer in the area, or move to an area with fewer lawyers
