<u>Answer:
</u>
The approach of ethics that is described here is that of moral reasoning.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When we delve down into the probe of whether a certain type of behavior is right or wrong, we actually try to find a reason for why the behavior is right or wrong.
- This approach of probing for a reason in order to prove a certain action as right or wrong culminates in an exhibition of the moral that is behind the behavior committed.
<h2><em><u>I</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>THINK</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>THE</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>ANSWER</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>IS</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>OPTION</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>D</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>THAT</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>IS</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>OVULE</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>&</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>POLLEN</u></em></h2>
D is the answer for this question. I hope this helped you out. I know it would help me.
Answer:
The best response of the options provided is Option B: Conflict theory.
Explanation:
The best choice of the options provided is conflict theory because conflict theorists take a critical stance toward existing social arrangements like the way that illness is defined. This can affect the access that people without power have to services or to livelihood, if the way that the powerful define illness works to their disadvantage in some way. An example would be denying someone disability status because their condition is not recognized as an illness that can affect productivity. This could make it so the person who is less powerful has to continue working despite their illness or disability and it may deny them benefits.
