A recent study indicated that the “longer” men were married, the “lower” their risk was of developing a disease.
The deputy governor can interpret the law, determine its constitutionality and apply it to individual cases in the supreme court.
<h3>
What is a Supreme court?</h3>
- The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States.
- It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court actions and state court actions, including points of federal law.
- It also has its own jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, in particular "all cases involving ambassadors, other ministers of public service and consuls, and cases in which a State is said to be a party."
- The Court has powers of judicial review and has the power to find laws that violate any provision of the Constitution.
- It can also revoke executive orders that violate the Constitution or applicable law.
- However, it may only act in connection with matters within the area of law for which it has jurisdiction.
- The courts have ruled that they can adjudicate cases that have political implications, but that they have no authority to adjudicate unjustifiable political issues.
Thus, the deputy governor can interrupt the case in between and can appeal in the supreme court.
To know more about supreme court refer to:
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer: False
Explanation: On the contrary, reinforcement theory is based on explanations for behavioural change by repeating behaviour with positive consequences while, of course, that with negative consequences is not repeated. This is accomplished by the desired shaping of behaviour, that is, shaping into certain direction, that is, in a positive direction by using a reward to reinforce positive behaviour and correcting unwanted behaviour by using a punishment for behaviour with negative consequences. This theory and its use is in fact a method for modifying behaviour.
I believe the answer is option a
Well let's start with theft. Just because the keys are there doesn't mean that's an open invitation to take something.
Then there's the business of driving
- without a licence
- with no insurance
- with no name on the registration.
What do you think? Does that go beyond unruly or mischievous? And these are just general considerations. Wait till insurance gets into it. In come cases they may not pay. So now what?
Four general counts and more to come from the lawyers who deal with this sort of thing all the time. I would say that 14 year old better start worrying a bit.
