Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
the denominator is the number that is down or under the fraction line
Answer:
If cost of one box of card is $7.50 then the no of cards produced is 6667 cards and if cost of one box of card is $10.50 then the no of cards produced is 4762 cards
Step-by-step explanation:
The cost of one box of cards = $7.50
Initial investment = $50,000
No of box of cards produced = Initial investment / cost of one box of card
No of box of cards produced = 50,000/7.50
No of box of cards produced = 6667 cards.
if the cost of one box of cards is increased = $10.50
No of box of cards produced = Initial investment / cost of one box of card
No of box of cards produced = 50,000/10.50
No of box of cards produced = 4762 cards.
So, if cost of one box of card is $7.50 then the no of cards produced is 6667 cards and if cost of one box of card is $10.50 then the no of cards produced is 4762 cards
Well if you're wanting to use substitution, you first have to end up with one term on either side of the equation. Use the second one as it's easiest.
So: x-2y=11, so find -2y as there is a -2y in the first equation.
then that becomes -2y=11-x. then sub that into equation 1, and you get:
-x+11-x=-13, which equals to -2x+11=-13, which is -2x=-24, so therefore
x=12. then chuck the x into any of the equations to find what y equals.
hope this helps!
![\bf f(x)=y=2x+sin(x) \\\\\\ inverse\implies x=2y+sin(y)\leftarrow f^{-1}(x)\leftarrow g(x) \\\\\\ \textit{now, the "y" in the inverse, is really just g(x)} \\\\\\ \textit{so, we can write it as }x=2g(x)+sin[g(x)]\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20f%28x%29%3Dy%3D2x%2Bsin%28x%29%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ainverse%5Cimplies%20x%3D2y%2Bsin%28y%29%5Cleftarrow%20f%5E%7B-1%7D%28x%29%5Cleftarrow%20g%28x%29%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ctextit%7Bnow%2C%20the%20%22y%22%20in%20the%20inverse%2C%20is%20really%20just%20g%28x%29%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ctextit%7Bso%2C%20we%20can%20write%20it%20as%20%7Dx%3D2g%28x%29%2Bsin%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C)
![\bf \textit{let's use implicit differentiation}\\\\ 1=2\cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}+cos[g(x)]\cdot \cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}\impliedby \textit{common factor} \\\\\\ 1=\cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}[2+cos[g(x)]]\implies \cfrac{1}{[2+cos[g(x)]]}=\cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}=g'(x)\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ g'(2)=\cfrac{1}{2+cos[g(2)]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Blet%27s%20use%20implicit%20differentiation%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A1%3D2%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%2Bcos%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%5Cimpliedby%20%5Ctextit%7Bcommon%20factor%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A1%3D%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%5B2%2Bcos%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5B2%2Bcos%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5D%7D%3D%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%3Dg%27%28x%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%27%282%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%2Bcos%5Bg%282%29%5D%7D)
now, if we just knew what g(2) is, we'd be golden, however, we dunno
BUT, recall, g(x) is the inverse of f(x), meaning, all domain for f(x) is really the range of g(x) and, the range for f(x), is the domain for g(x)
for inverse expressions, the domain and range is the same as the original, just switched over
so, g(2) = some range value
that means if we use that value in f(x), f( some range value) = 2
so... in short, instead of getting the range from g(2), let's get the domain of f(x) IF the range is 2
thus 2 = 2x+sin(x)
![\bf 2=2x+sin(x)\implies 0=2x+sin(x)-2 \\\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ g'(2)=\cfrac{1}{2+cos[g(2)]}\implies g'(2)=\cfrac{1}{2+cos[2x+sin(x)-2]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%202%3D2x%2Bsin%28x%29%5Cimplies%200%3D2x%2Bsin%28x%29-2%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%27%282%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%2Bcos%5Bg%282%29%5D%7D%5Cimplies%20g%27%282%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%2Bcos%5B2x%2Bsin%28x%29-2%5D%7D)
hmmm I was looking for some constant value... but hmm, not sure there is one, so I think that'd be it
A. Diagonals bisect each other is always true. Each diagonal<span> cuts the </span>other<span> into two equal parts. It is because of the parallel lines in the parallelogram. </span>
