1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
morpeh [17]
2 years ago
11

A) How animals suffer from testing them on human products?

English
1 answer:
kodGreya [7K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a- Animals do not react positively to human products being tested on them as they are used to determine faults and any harm.

b- the human products often contain harmful chemicals in testing stages on animals which can lead to genetic disorders

c- because there is no definitive answer which is why they're testing to find our what is going to harm the humans

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ASAP <br> I will mark brainliest
a_sh-v [17]
Lengthy

It goes into detail saying how “day and night” they were working hard as many days passed.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS HELP
I am Lyosha [343]

Answer:

Robots are often portrayed in media to be evil and want to end all of humanity. That is not the case. That scenario is more fiction than true, and even then, robots have assisted humanity in things we never could have done without them. Robots assist us with dangerous tasks such as welding metals, which can easily cause injuries to humans. Robots can also go into areas that humans cannot easily go to, such as space. Along with that, humans now have assistance with doing every day tasks with robots, such as helping them walk around and help them move their body. Despite all that the media and science fiction says about robots, they assist us in many ways, and we wouldn't be where we are today without them.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why is it a good idea to start a research project with a research question?
frutty [35]

Answer:

It helps you focus your research so that you stay interested in it and find sources more easily

8 0
2 years ago
What argument is Gandhi making in this excerpt? How does he construct and support this argument? Font Sizes
horrorfan [7]
Gandhi's trial for sedition, and the subsequent imprisonment that began in March 1922 and ended with his release in January of 1924, marked the first time that he had faced prosecution in India. The judge, C.N. Broomfield, was uncertain what to do with his famous prisoner–Gandhi was clearly guilty as charged, and willingly admitted as much, even going so far as to ask for the heaviest possible sentence. Like many Englishmen, Broomfield developed a liking for the Mahatma, commenting, "even those who differ from you in politics look upon you as a man of high ideals and of noble and even saintly life." He gave Gandhi the lightest sentence possible: six years in prison, which would be later reduced to just two years.

Willingness to accept imprisonment was, of course, an integral part of satyagraha, and Gandhi was perfectly content while in prison. His captors allowed him a spinning wheel and reading material, and save for a bout of appendicitis (which actually hastened his release), he was, he wrote to a friend, "happy as a bird."

Still, it must be noted that during his two-year imprisonment, Gandhi's great nonviolent revolution essentially fell apart. Non-cooperation gradually died away as Indians drifted back to their jobs and routines; the Congress leaders, notably Motilal Nehru and C.R. Das, were participating in local government again; worst of all, Hindu-Muslim unity had fallen apart, and violence rocked many communities. The struggle for Indian independence had run aground on the immense, seemingly insuperable problem of disunity among Indians, who had never been a nation in the Western sense, and remained divided by caste, language, and most of all, religion.

Gandhi's greatest achievement, throughout the '20s, '30s and '40s, was to overcome these differences, to unify India by making himself the symbol of unity. Of course, he never explicitly claimed this role–to do so would have been anathema to his selfless philosophy–yet it was undeniably Gandhi's person, more than the slogans of nationalism and liberation, that united Brahmins and untouchables, Hindus and Muslims in the struggle against the British. His amazing personal determination served as a beacon to all–his behavior after leaving prison is a perfect example: no sooner had he left the trying conditions of prison than he immediately commended a three-week fast requesting peace between the warring religious factions, an event that captured the imagination of the world and indeed went a long way toward easing tensions between Hindus and Muslims. His "soul-force" may well have been the only thing that could bring all Indians together, and he used it to amazing effect.

Even as Gandhi served to unify the Indian people, his figure served to expose the contradictions within the British position on the subcontinent. For while the members of Gandhi's home-rule movement strengthened their arguments by pointing to the oppression of the British Viceroys, those Viceroys attempting to quell the Gandhi phenomenon in fact failed because of a policy not oppressive enough. Theirs was a liberal empire in the end, and they were raised in a liberal tradition that prized freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; thus they could not counter satyagraha and stay true to themselves. Had Gandhi practiced satyagraha in, say, Stalin's Soviet Union or Hitler's Germany–or had the British been willing to violate their own liberal principles and imprison him for life, deport him, or even execute him–the struggle for independence might have taken a dramatically different turn. But then, such a crackdown was never a realistic possibility. Indeed, most of his British antagonists genuinely liked Gandhi, and by the 1920s, weary of war and empire, most of them had reconciled themselves to some sort of home rule for India in the near future. Independence was coming, in one shape or another, despite the resistance of die-hard imperialists in Britain, because the British had lost the will to sustain their empire; and yet the Viceroys, governors and Secretaries of State were still not willing to give India total independence.

8 0
3 years ago
What narrative technique is used in the following quote? Before Mistress Hutchinson had arrived in America, in the fall of 1634,
Likurg_2 [28]
It is figurative language....
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read this excerpt from "Gravity" by Judith Ortiz Cofer: I could never ask any of my friends over to our apartment. They would ha
    10·2 answers
  • Which sentence contains an incorrectly punctuated appositive or appositive phrase? A. A gymnast, Christy Weber, will coach us. B
    13·1 answer
  • You are writing an essay in which you are analyzing the benefits of good oral hygiene. What would be the best method of organiza
    5·2 answers
  • How to take at least four pictures so that I can get my English work done?
    7·1 answer
  • Which word best transitions from one sentence to a different idea in another sentence?
    8·2 answers
  • How does the author’s personal experience illustrate his main argument in this text?
    6·2 answers
  • the portrait of a lady in the first paragraph, the author uses the image of “fresh taste” in the mouth as a metaphor describing
    7·1 answer
  • Hi, can you check my answers please?<br>​
    5·2 answers
  • What purpose does this part of the story serve?
    8·1 answer
  • The Lottery by Shirley Jackson 11
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!