Answer:
b. Gilmer-Aikin Laws
Explanation:
Gilmer-Aikin law was signed in 1949 by the Texas Legislature with the main objective of reform of the educational sector.
This law helped to increase the state funding and was established by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) which was involved in carrying out the educational program of the state. This validates b. Gilmer-Aikin Laws as the answer.
Answer:
The Legislative makes the laws; the Executive executes the law and the Judiciary interprets the law. The Legislative branch plays the most important role in creating the laws.
Explanation:
The Legislative Branch’s role includes making and passing laws according to citizen’s will. The Executive Branch’s can approve or veto a bill from the Legislative, the President is responsible to sign the bills and turn it into law, also for executing the law. The Judicial branch’s role is to review and interpret the law.
The Legislative plays the most important role in creating the laws.
<span>According to Robert Sternberg, when two people are happily dating one another but not making future plans, this is called romantic love. Romantic love links people passionately by affection and physical passion. People in this kind of relationship have deep discussions that support them to know close information about one another. They love sexual desire and care. Partners may be at the time when a long-term relationship occurs but future plans are still unsure.</span>
A sandblasted rock could be different in color because sandblasting takes the top layer of the rock (which has been weathered) off.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a court case that resided with William Marbury being appointed by John Adams, but during the process of his commission, Thomas Jefferson became president, and he and Secretary of State James Madison, added new courts and new judges. William Marbury's commission was not delivered to him, therefore petitioning to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the delivery of his commission.
The Court found Madison's refusal to deliver commissions was illegal but did not grant Marbury a writ of mandamus. Instead, the court held that Marbury did not have the right, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to claim to the Supreme Court that Madison's act was unconstitutional.
The court knew that a writ of mandamus would be the proper way to fix the situation, but concluded that the court couldn't issue it. Therefore making it clear that Congress did not have the power to modify the Constitution through regular legislation.
Doing this, the Supreme Court established the principle in judicial review and expanded the powers by having the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
Hope that helps your question.
