Answer: The person has the right to remain silent and refuse to answer any questions.
Explanation:
The Miranda warning or rights is a statement that the police give to anyone who has been arrested in the United States. This warning has a format that is issued to every person at the time of the arrest.
The Miranda warning is given as follows:
1- You have the right to remain silent
2- Anything you say can be and will be used against you in court
3- You have the right to speak with a lawyer and have a lawyer present during the interrogation
4- If you cannot afford the services of a lawyer, the government assigns you one
5- Are you aware of all the rights that have been mentioned before?
Every person at the time of arrest has rights and they should not be violated. When the person is not aware of this, it can generate evidence against itself, even do the person is innocent. Everyone must know what they should and should not do when they are arrested.
The name of Miranda Warning arises as a result of a case happened to a person named Ernesto Arturo Miranda. This person was found guilty of crimes of kidnapping and armed robbery. These charges were adjudicated due to Ernesto's confession when he was interrogated by the police. This case became the historic the United States Supreme Court case known as the Miranda case against Arizona. From this moment it was dictated that every person at the time of being arrested must know what their rights are.
Stratosphere hope I am correct
There is direct and indirect means of control, that may often be found in our homes or schools; praise and condemnation of behaviour is one direct way to control an individual, while an indirect approach may be through traditions, customs, etc. Positive and negative means of control, according to Kimble Young, involve praise, fame and respect in regards to positive control. Negative however, takes shape in the form of severe criticism, punishment and shame.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The difference in Jules's performance can be explained by the phenomenon of Social Facilitation.
The Social Facilitation theory says that people have the tendency of performing better in contests when they know they are being watched by fans or spectators. This theory tries to explain the behavior of persons in social environments.
That is why when he practiced with his father, he swam at a moderate pace, even though his father goaded him to swim faster. However, when he participated in the swimming competition at school, the attention of the gathered crowd and the presence of other swimmers made him swim faster than he did during practice.
This social pressure made him improve his performance. Jules knew he was in a contest and that he had to overperform his competitors if he did not want to be ridicule to choke under pressure.
