The best way is: B. flat, so that the north pole of the magnets on the train point up and the north poles of the magnets on the track point down.
<h3>What is the law of magnetism?</h3>
The law of magnetism states that the like poles of a magnet repel one another while unlike (different) poles attract each other. Thus, two north (N) poles of a magnet would repel one another while a north (N) and south (S) would attract each other.
Based on the law of magnetism, the best way to arrange the magnets on the train and on the track, so as to allow the model train levitate is flat, as this would make the north (N) pole of the magnets on the train point up and the north (N) poles of the magnets on the track point down.
Read more on law of magnetism here: brainly.com/question/14945557
#SPJ1
<u>Complete Question:</u>
Jolie builds a model of a maglev train. She uses disc magnets to levitate the train. A disc magnet has its north and south poles on its faces, as shown.
What is the best way to arrange the magnets on the train and on the track so that the model train levitates?
With a typical 52-card deck that has 4 jacks, Margaret is playing a game. The game is initiated by the first player to choose a jack. When choosing first, Margaret's probability of selecting Jack is 1/13.
The same will occur since probability will be determined using the formula necessary outcome divided by total outcome.
Here, the total number of cards in the deck (total outcome) equals 52.
Given that Margaret can select any of the four jacks, the necessary result (number of jacks) is 4.
Probability is 4/52, or 1 by 13, which is the required probability for the question.
To learn more about probability, click
brainly.com/question/11034287
#SPJ4
Iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies (IESDS) is a common technique that is used to get solutions to games that involve iteratively removing dominated strategies.
<h3>What is a weakly dominated strategy?</h3>
This refers to the type of strategy that delivers an equal or worse outcome than an alternative strategy.
Hence, we can see that in game theory, the use of strategic dominance is used when one strategy is better than another strategy for one player, not withstanding the efforts of the other player.
Therefore, this can be eliminated with the use of iterations to remove the weakly dominated strategies
Read more about game theory here:
brainly.com/question/13548182
#SPJ1
The complete proofs with all the reasons and statements; have been enumerated below
<h3>What are triangle proofs?</h3>
From the attached triangle, we can complete the proofs as follows;
Statement 1; AB * BE = CB * BD
Reason 1; Given
Statement 2; CB/BE = AB/BD
Reason 2; Property of Cross Multiplication
Statement 3; ∠ABC ≅ ∠DBE
Reason 3; Vertical Angles
Statement 4; ΔABC ~ ΔDBE
Reason 4; SAS property of similarity
Read more about Triangle Proofs at; brainly.com/question/22721185
According to Hooke's law, a 30-N force stretches a spring by 0.73 m if the spring constant k is such that
30 N = k (0.73 m)
k = (30 N) / (0.73 m)
k ≈ 4.1 N/m
