1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grin007 [14]
3 years ago
5

How did Washington feel about multiple parties in the newly-founded nation?

History
1 answer:
dimaraw [331]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: he didn’t really like it

Explanation:

Hope this helps plz give brainlest

You might be interested in
Which president was helped by a strong economy during his reelection bid? bill clinton jimmy carter gerald ford george h. w. bus
miskamm [114]
Fairly certain the answer is Bill Clinton. If not I apologize
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
__________ was a fourteen century chronicler​
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Amir Khusrao

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
*ANSWER ASAP PLS *
Annette [7]

b.) powers that allow the each branch to curb the others
5 0
3 years ago
The Vietnam was quick, lasting only a few years<br> O True<br> O False
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

it is right

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The outcome of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison defined the constitutionality of the
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

B) Judiciary Act of 1789.

Explanation:

John Marshall ruled on this case as the Chief Justice. He first answered that Marbury had a right to his job because it had been signed and approved. The actual delivery was a custom, not a requirement. He then ruled that a writ of mandamus (a type of court order) was the correct way for Marbury to rule. Finally, he noted that the Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the Supreme Court to make this kind of ruling.

<em>The next question was who could decide this issue. Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court could decide it because the Judiciary Act of 1789 said that they could. However, Marshall said that a section of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. That section allowed the Supreme Court to make a writ but the United States Constitution did not. Therefore, that section was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court could not make a writ for Marbury. </em>

Marshall looking over the Constitution and the statute is judicial review, a statement that the Supreme Court had an independent power to determine whether something was constitutional or not.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Congress's attempt to "Americanize" Indians with the Dawes act failed because
    7·1 answer
  • What definition of extremist does king use when he gladly accepts the label
    10·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST!!!<br><br> What do you think?
    14·1 answer
  • What were two main compromises of the constitutional convention and how did it effect the government?
    9·1 answer
  • What is one reason document a would be a reliable source to understand what happened when moctezuma met cortes?
    15·1 answer
  • In what ways do the Crusades lend themselves to the current mistrust between Christians and
    8·1 answer
  • What caused the Sepoy Rebellion?
    15·2 answers
  • The use of poll affected which of the following groups
    7·1 answer
  • How can we use the properties of matter to identify materials?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which year does RUBADA was established.​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!