1. In the criminal justice system, John can temporarily put Jack in custody pending the arrival of the police. Jack was not detained for a period longer than five minutes and not for a civil wrong.
Thus, in this lawsuit for the tort of unlawful imprisonment, Jack will lose because he committed a crime. He cannot apply a civil law to a criminal case.
2. Adriana is correct that her personal assets cannot be reached in this lawsuit brought by the shareholders of DEF, Inc. because SLA Accountants, LLP is a limited liability partnership and not just an ordinary partnership.
A limited liability partnership, like a limited liability company, offers members limited liability. However, the shareholders of DEF, Inc. may decide to sue Adriana personally.
3. Andrew is wrong because the car handed over by Sam was not a completed inter-vivos gift. The transfer was not absolute but conditional upon Sam not returning from the Middle East.
As a conditional transfer of gift, the vesting of the ownership interest created by the transfer depends on the fulfillment of a condition.
Thus, since the transfer condition did not materialize, Andrew should return the car to Sam in good faith.
Learn more about inter vivos gifts and limited liability partnerships here brainly.com/question/14767795 and brainly.com/question/1166757
Answer:
A. The existence of a religious life
Explanation:
The creatures which are half-animal and half-human or have features from animal ofter represent goods(Seth, Tiamat) or sons of goods (Horus)
They are described with qualities above normal human, like a good ability o see which is depicted as having the head of a falcon (Horus)
or to have mutation generate by the making of goods ( the medusa was raped by Poseidon and get hair of snakes)
Answer:
Future value of total improvement cost = $1,788,552.44
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Regular deposit amount = $250,000
No. of period = 5 years
Interest rate = 18%
Future value = Regular deposit amount × [((1+interest rate per period)^no. of period - 1) ÷ interest rate per period]
Face value = $250,000×[((1+0.18)^5-1) ÷ 0.18]
= $250,000×7.154
= $1,788,552.44
Future value of total improvement cost = $1,788,552.44
Answer:
Consumers should not buy from companies that don't source materials
Explanation:
Companies should never have an excuse for not sourcing for their materials responsively and responsibly. They owe an ethical responsibility as well as a duty to offer their customers qualitative products at the best price and that is most sustainable to the environment.In recent times, through the widespread use of social media and the instrument of investigative journalism, it has been able to bring to the surface, the less than responsible activities of many companies in sourcing for their interest of the public and the environment.The 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" shows an avid description of how diamonds are mined and traded in the war-torn country of Sierra Leonne depicting the violation of Human and Child rights and how is excessively enriched diamond suppliers and companies.It is clear that many companies despite the public outcry for transparency in revealing their supply chain in sourcing for their materials still chose unorthodox practices. It therefore, falls on the consumers to spend their money responsibly and make smart and credible choices with their finances by refusing to buy from companies that are not transparent with their source materials.Consumers are the life-wire of any business and the hope of any business survival rests majorly on consumer satisfaction. Researches have shown that companies are no being accountable with the natural resources are utilized and have been used to cause serious harm to people and the environment. Since the companies manage to evade adequate regulations and responsibilities, it falls on the consumers to ensure that their money serves them to the greatest value.
