Answer: Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.
Context/explanation:
Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests. So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.
While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them. As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime." Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion. Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR. That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death. Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.
Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism. Again as noted by The Churchill Project: "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire." As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.
<span>For starters, technology developed and now a lot more people could hear these adresses and see them on TV and hear them through the radio and they could be recorded and studied. The Supreme court decisions were important because they decided what would happen to people and their rights. For example, the supreme court first decided that separate but equal was a good doctrine, but later they decided it was unconstitutional. The addresses could affect public opinion to support something that the congress didn't want, and the supreme court would act on behalf of the people.</span>
Answer:
1. Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)
2. Berkeley Free Speech Movement
Explanation:
The examples of antiwar student movements during the 1960s are:
1. Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)
2. Berkeley Free Speech Movement
The above assertion is evident in the fact that Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was established in the 1960s as a national student activist organization in the United States. The group aims to stand against the principles of continual leaders, hierarchical relationships, and parliamentary procedure. They also go against the issue of the Vietnam war while supporting Black power.
Similarly, the Berkeley Free Speech Movement was a student protest group established in the 1960s. The group protested many things, including the ban of on-campus political activities, the student's right to free speech and academic freedom, and other civil rights movement activities and anti-Vietnam war movement.
Answer:
They contributed to the establishment of colonies for trading purposes
Explanation:
omae wa mou shindeiru
Answer:
You would tell them that they need to come back down to earth.
Explanation:
