import java.util.Scanner;
public class JavaApplication41 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner scan = new Scanner(System.in);
String language = scan.nextLine();
if (language.toLowerCase().equals("java")){
System.out.println("Awesome!");
}
else if (language.toLowerCase().equals("python")){
System.out.println("A very simple language!");
}
else if (language.toLowerCase().equals("ruby")){
System.out.println("Are you sure?");
}
else if (language.toLowerCase().equals("javascript")){
System.out.println("Easy enough");
}
else if (language.toLowerCase().equals("c")){
System.out.println("Cool!");
}
}
}
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Nice!
Explanation:
i like physics and biology :)
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
Given
if(fish > 400) {
Required
What is the condition checking?
The above statement is an if conditional statement. Analysing the statement in bits:
if -> This represents the beginning of the conditional statement
fish -.> The variable that is being checked
> 400 -> The condition which the variable is being measured by.
So, the statement above is checking if the value of variable fish is greater than 400.
<em>If the condition is true, the instructions associated to that if statement will be executed.</em>
Answer:
customer satisfaction
Explanation:
The consumer electronics company started a new training program for the consumer service employees as the company found that the consumer service employees were following the same strategy to address all types of consumer issues due to which they were not able to communicate with consumers properly.
This leads to improvement in service ratings and sales.
In this scenario, the consumer service team improved <u>customer satisfaction</u>
