The question is incomplete, so the complete question is as follows:
What is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time?
A. Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
B. Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.
C. Economists may learn more about how ancient governments operated.
D. New X-ray technology proves that previous medical conclusions were incorrect.
Answer:
A). Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
The Archeologists works to reveal several historical interpretations on thebasis of facts gathered from primary sources of evidence.
The example that [roves chnaging interpretation over time by archeologists is that they may uncover new climate evidence which can change the earlier facts and can reveal several new things. Archeologists can change tehir views whenever they will find some new and more strong evidences.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
Answer:
It could work, but really, it is just ineffective because there is a high risk of losing and falling into debt. Lotteries and slot machines are just not worth it. You could end up with less money for education than more.
Explanation:
I Thought Maybe Is Drowning
The answer is C only able to vote in local elections
Answer:
B. The Constitution
Explanation:
The other options make no sense. King of England does not have influence in the American Government. The President did not establish the three branches, he himself is the executive branch. The Supreme Court did not establish the three branches, they are the judiciary branch.
