1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KatRina [158]
3 years ago
12

BRO I BE MAD I BE TRYNA SLEEP LOLLLLL

English
1 answer:
Nataly [62]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

O_O

Explanation:

Cool XD

You might be interested in
What does chips stand for in the american tv drama?
Anika [276]
California Highway Patrol. The "i" doesn't have a meaning.
7 0
3 years ago
What inference can you make by contrasting the ideas in the first two stanzas of the poem to the last stanza?
tamaranim1 [39]
The correct answer to the first question (what can be inferred by contrasting the ideas in the first two stanzas of the poem to the last stanza) is D) The awful tempest rages all night long and terrifies the speaker of the poem.
The first two stanzas, through adjectives like "awful" and "gaunt", expressions like "spectre's cloak" and "creatures", and verbs like "chuckled", "whistled" and "gnashed", convey that the tempest was terrifying, which can be understood by the speaker's word choice when telling the reader about it.
The last stanza shows that the storm lasted all night when the speaker says "morning lit", and, by expressing her relief and how peaceful she thought everything was after the storm had passed, the speaker intensifies the idea that it had been a terrifying storm. So, the correct answer to this question would be D.
Answer A is not correct because nothing indicates that the speaker would be fascinated by the storm, rather scared. Answer B is not correct because the tempest is not saddened by the morning sun, on the contrary, the speaker shows his relief and peace almost with happiness, which can be inferred by the presence of an exclamation mark in the last verse. Answer C is not correct because the tempest is not saddened at first, it is scary.
The correct answer to the second question (what device did Dickinson employ to create the effect in lines 1 and 2) is C) Paradox.
A paradox is a statement that seems to be contradictory in logic, that seems to not be true, but that also is not false. The speaker creates an absurd effect by using a paradox to describe the tempest when she suggests a storm with gaunt and few clouds. So, the correct answer to this question would be C.
Answer A isn't correct, the device used by Dickinson couldn't be an hyperbole because that figure of speech would cause the contrary effect; the storm would be shown like something grandiose and extremely terrifying, with an exaggerated connotation. Answer B isn't correct because there is no presence of an onomatopoeia in both lines since there is no written sound. Answer D isn't correct because the storm is not personified with human characteristics, rather the clouds are "gaunt", which is an adjective that can refer to objects.
The correct answer to the third question (why did Dickinson most likely use the phrase "black, as of a spectre's cloak" in the first stanza) is D) to create a feeling of darkness and gloom.
The black spectre's cloak mentioned is an image that describes how the gaunt and few clouds created a dark plain sky that covered the earth and the heaven, leaving everything dark and gloomy. That was the storm's appearance. Therefore, the correct answer to this question would be D.
Answer A is not correct because, although the storm could have been a dream, nothing in the poem indicates that it was; on the contrary, the description of the storm going away in the morning indicates that it wasn't a bad dream, but something real. Answer B is not correct because the black cloak mentioned doesn't transmit a sensation of coldness but of darkness. Answer C is not correct because the poem isn't comic, not even slightly, and this expression makes it even darker.
The correct answer to the last question (how does the poet convey the seriousness of the storm) is A) She uses personification to emphasize the impact of the storm.
When the poet describes the storm as a "monster" whose "faded eyes turned slowly to his native coast", she is using personification to emphasize how serious the storm was, as if it were like a monster with eyes that can turn, and with power and strength. Hence, the correct answer to this question is A.
Answer B isn't correct because neither does the poet use paradoxes in the last stanza nor does she show the storm as majestic. Answer C isn't correct because she doesn't use informal language and the storm seems to have been very serious and strong, and not the opposite. Answer D isn't correct because she doesn't show the changes that are coming through metaphors, the poet actually shows only the peaceful feeling that was left when the storm was gone.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write the following sentence using one of the conditional sentences, 1, they didn't listen to me so they went the wrong way?
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

if they dont listen to me they'll go the wrong way

Explanation:

It uses the if word to represent the condition in the sentence.

6 0
1 year ago
Read the sentences.
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

I am positive B.

I will double check for you.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your own words what is this excerpt from the “Universal declaration of human rights” saying? Include the central idea and ke
nataly862011 [7]
The Universal Declaration begins by recognising that 'the inherent dignity of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world'. It declares that human rights are universal – to be enjoyed by all p
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When the author discusses Douglass's speech at the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society meeting in 1841, what are the author’s fee
    11·2 answers
  • With proper exercise fat can be converted to muscle. True False
    12·2 answers
  • After dominic peeled out of the parking lot in his new sports car, Sheralyn said "Im sure nobody will notice him now"
    11·2 answers
  • 1. Barbara McClintock won the Nobel Prize in 1983 when her ___ that genes in corn kernels could "jump" proved correct.
    13·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    5·1 answer
  • Read the sentence from a personal narrative. My grandfather used to spend hours telling me stories I loved to hear. Which best r
    5·2 answers
  • Chapter 1 summary of killer of enimies
    8·1 answer
  • Write a sentence using 1 of the following as an adjective phrase:
    9·1 answer
  • Things fall apart
    10·2 answers
  • Read the short article and answer the question........ If it is right, I will give you brianliest!
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!