X – y = 23x + y = 10all of yalls answer r wrong the answer is x= 3 and y= 1
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
y = x/4 -1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
given coordinates : ( -2, -1 ) and ( 2 , 0 )
gradient = y2 - y1 / x2 - x1
= 0 - -1 / 2 - -2
= 1/4
equation of line:
y - y1 = m( x - x1 )
y - 0 = 1/4 ( x - 2 )
y = x/4 -1/2
the line shown below to confirm:
