Yes. I totally agree with that statement. 10/10
Answer:
is 8 porque s mi nose maje
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
Both brothers will have the same amount of money is their saving accounts after six months.
Step-by-step explanation:
I worked this out by finding out the first 8 months of savings for both brothers:
Patrick: His brother:
200 150
225 185
250 220
275 253
300 290
325 325
375 360
400 395
I then looked across my results to see that at 6 months both brothers had $325.
Hope this helped.