There are different types of debate. Parliamentary type of formal debate is typically about current events or philosophy.
- Parliamentary type of formal debate is simply known to be a debate style that has two-on-two debate, between the affirmative team.
It is referred to as the Government or the Proposition, and it also has a negative team called the Opposition.
The part or role name played by the debater are borrowed from the British Parliament, wand its judge is called the Speaker.
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/6246202
Kayla is the mother of a 4-month-old boy. She often ignores the cries of her son and seems to only attend to him when it is convenient for her. She has even pushed the baby away from her when her husband tried to get her to care for the baby. Kayla's son is probably insecure attached to his mother.
365.25 days. the .25 that makes the need for a leap year every four years.
Some researchers claim that more innocent individuals have been wrongly convicted due to inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony is common than all other causes combined.
- Eyewitness testimony is a word used in law. It alludes to a description provided by individuals about an occasion they were present for. For instance, they can be asked to describe a crime or a car accident they saw during a trial. This includes information about the crime scene, the offenders' identities, etc.
- Studies have indicated that roughly half of all wrongful convictions are caused by false eyewitness testimony. When Ohio State University researchers looked at hundreds of false convictions, they found that about 52 percent of the errors were due to inaccuracies made by eyewitnesses.
Learn more about Eyewitness testimony from here :brainly.com/question/26651069
#SPJ4
Answer:
As an undergraduate studying psychology, my intended major is crime investigation.
I started having interest in this field since the day my uncle's was convicted for a crime he did not commit, just because he pleaded guilty due to the pains that was inflicted on him to do so and be free in jail. I felt this should not be a proper way to investigate crime. That is why I was motivated to major in this field, so as to bring the change needed in the field.
Sometimes I practice this investigation, using my younger siblings. It has helped me to understand that empathy is still important in crime investigation, even though it sometimes makes us feel biased. I have become the only one my parents rely on, to determine who among my siblings that has committed an offence during dispute.
