Lincoln reasoned out that there were insurgent agents who were intent on destroying the Union without war but there were parties who would rather wage war and have an easy triumph.
Here is his reason:
"While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving<span> the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to </span>destroy<span> it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would </span>make<span> war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would </span>accept<span> war rather than let it perish, and the war came." - President Abraham Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address March 4, 1865.</span>
They would go by walk most of the time as it was the cheapest option, so they could get supplies or visit friends/family. However, they would go by horseback as well.
Answer:
Similarities:
-The two documents are popular in their countries of origin with the Magna Carta being popular in Britain and the Declaration being popular in the United States.
- The documents were both borne out of rebellion; the Magna Carta was first established after conflicts between the King and rebel barons and the Declaration was established after conflict between the thirteen American states and Great Britain.
-The two documents both sought to assert individual human freedoms and rights.
Differences:
- Where the Declaration confirms that power rests with the people, the Magna Carta asserted that power rests with the sovereign until changes through the Six Statutes sought to limit these powers.
- In the Magna Carta the rights of the people are granted by the government while in the Declaration, people's rights are God given. The Declaration was based on universal principles regarding all human beings but the Magna Carta was based on a particular group of people (barons) but which was later changed to the more inclusive term any freeman.
Explanation:
Schools, libraries, police stations, fire stations
The correct answer is A. State rights
It is the right of a state to not accept, that is nullify, a law that the federal government has passed if the state believes that the law is unconstitutional.
