1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katarina [22]
2 years ago
8

Which term describes a government in which the king or queen is the official head of state but power is limited by a constitutio

n (is more of a ceremonial position)?Immersive Reader
monarchy

confederal

constitutional monarchy

absolute monarchy
History
1 answer:
JulijaS [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

constitutional monarchy

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which law in history never actually became a law due to it being unnecessary, offensive, or being fake? (Like if someone decided
vekshin1

Answer:

The DREAM (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) act. it didn't become a law because it didn't even get enough votes to make it to the presidents office. hope this helps :)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match each description to the appropriate type of government.
Andru [333]
Absolute monarchy - monarch holds supreme power and existed in England before the signing of the Magna Carta.

Constitutional monarchy - the leftover answers
3 0
2 years ago
Do the states that have the highest and lowest amount of slaves have anything in common ?
olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

In the United States before 1865, a slave state was a state in which the slave trade was legal, while a free state was one in which it was not. There were some enslaved persons in most free states in the 1840 census, and the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 specifically stated that an enslaved person remained enslaved even when she or he fled to a free state. Between 1812 and 1850, it was considered important that the number of free and slave states were kept in balance, so new states were admitted in pairs.

6 0
3 years ago
In the U.S. Supreme Court case of The Cherokee Nation vs Georgia (1831),
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

2) the cherokee were not considered citizens and did not have the right to bring a case to the federal court

Explanation:

In the U.S. Supreme Court case of The Cherokee Nation vs Georgia (1831),

the court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction in the case because the Cherokees were not considered citizens and had no right to bring a case to a federal court.

The proceeding was presided over by Justice Marshall who said the Cherokees were a dependent nation.

6 0
2 years ago
If you were successful in getting a law passed, you personally could be involved by:
Semenov [28]

Answer:

by not doing it or breaking or you could make it up and going thru the law

helpfull????

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Magna Carta was presented to King John in 1215 because people
    7·2 answers
  • Will give brainliest.... Answer this ASAP<br>What is Magna Carta? <br>​
    7·1 answer
  • 5. How does Gatsby say he spent his time after his family died?
    6·1 answer
  • When a bill passes the house and senate in substantially different forms, the differences are resolved in?
    14·1 answer
  • Ramses II presided over an era of prosperity in the new kingdom. Which most significantly reflected his prosperity?
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement about trade in the Ghana Empire is correct? A. Ghanaian blacksmiths produced high-quality trade goods from iron.
    6·1 answer
  • Twice as old as Sammy? Write it as an algebraic expression?
    7·2 answers
  • Smh
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!! i will give brainly
    12·1 answer
  • Please help i’ll give brainliest
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!