The "We" adds to the development of the <em>author’s message</em> to show that <u>everyone has a role to play.</u>
Your question is incomplete as you didn't provide the author's message. An overview of the answer will be provided.
An <em>author's message </em>simply means the big idea that's in a text. It is what the author wants the readers to know. It is sometimes the lesson that the author wants others to know.
In this case, since the emphasis is on "we", it means that the author wants everyone to do that particular thing that's addressed in the story. For example, if the message is about love, the author can write that we should <em>love</em> each other.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25172635
Answer:
She wasn't the least bit surprised to find out that her husband had an affair. (SURPRISE) It wasn't <u>surprising</u> to find out that her husband had an affair.
Explanation:
The word "surprising" is an adjective which means, 'causing surprise', or unexpected. When used in the sentence above, we see that it maintains the same meaning with the first sentence. In the first sentence, the woman was not surprised when she discovered that her husband had an affair.
In the second sentence, it was not a cause for surprise, when she found out that her husband had an affair. Therefore, the two sentences retain the same meaning.
Some elements of foreshadowing that are contained in <em>To Kill a Mockingbird </em>are:
- When Ewell threatens Atticus that he would get back at him
- Jem and Dill's description of Boo as a ghost
- The declaration of Scout about Boo as a person of incantation and secret signs.
<h3>What is Foreshadowing?</h3>
This refers to the literary techniques that are used to show a future event and how the events of the present influence such events.
Hence, we can see that foreshadowing was used in the given text and this is shown by the threat of Ewell towards Atticus which foreshadows his attack on the children of Atticus,
Read more about foreshadowing here:
brainly.com/question/25079664
#SPJ1
C. It is objective
It offers no bias or opinion, just facts.
Hope this helps!
The significant contrast between the records introduced in the essential source article "Unmistakable Farmer Robbed and Killed" and the optional source Midnight Assassin is that the article proposes that the murder was likely dedicated by criminals, while the extract recommends a more extensive scope of suspects.