Answer:
No, it is not a square
Step-by-step explanation:
If one wall is 19", that would mean the wall perpendicular to this wall is also 19" (in fact all of the walls would be 19"!) If this was a square, then the diagonal we draw at 20.62" would serve as the hypotenuse of a right triangle. One wall would serve as a leg, and another wall as another leg. If this is a square, then the Pythagorean's Theorem would be satisfied when we plug in the 2 wall measures for a and b, and the diagonal for c:
We need to see if this is a true statement. If the left side equals the right side, then the 2 legs of the right triangle are the same length, and the room, then is a square.
361 + 361 = 425.1844
Is this true? Does 722 = 425.1844? Definitely not. That means that the room is not a square.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
x=3
Answer:
a) π
b) 33.4
Step-by-step explanation:
C = πd
1) substitute 105 for C: 105 = πd
2) plug in approximate value of 3.14 for π: 105 = (3.14) d
3) isolate to solve for d: 105/3.14 = d
4) simplify: 105/3.14 ≈ 33.4
Correct Question:
Otero translated the phrase "three less than a number" into the expression 3 minus x. Which best describes the accuracy of Otero's expression?.
a. It is accurate. The phrase can be translated as "three" = 3, "less than" = subtraction, and "a number" = X, SO 3- X is
the correct expression.
b. It is inaccurate. Three is being subtracted from a number, so X-3 is what he should have written.
c. It is inaccurate. Three is being compared to a number, so 3 It is inaccurate. Three is being added to a number, so 3+ x is what he should have written.
Answer:
The answer is B because three less than a number means that a 3 is less than some number X meaning three is being subtracted from X. So equation should be X-3 rather than 3-X.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
if you do 3 divided by 4 then you get 0.75 then you have to do 0.75 times 2 and you get 1.5 dollars for 2 pounds
