The classic Trolley problem
It's been told and retold, with different variations, jokes, and ideas built on top of it. It's a great question in my opinion, it really does show where one's heart and ideas lie. Would you sacrifice the lives of strangers to save those you love? Or would you value the lives of these innocent people, with their own loved ones and stories ahead?
In reality, I don't think I've ever answered it for myself, but right now, for the sake of the question, I would go with saving my child. If I were a parent faced with this problem, hit in the heat of the moment with no time to think, derailing the track to kill the five in order to save my child would be my first instinct.
"Getting creative within reason" is very interesting. Obviously, people have tried to find loopholes in the original question—untying your child and setting the path that way, jumping in front of the train, stopping the trolley altogether. I don't have anything to add here, but I'm interested to see what others might come up with, and what dictates 'out of reason'.
— I hope this helps. Have a stellar day
The correct answer is A.
We can tell this because England's rocky shore has beaten back Neptune, the god of the sea -- meaning England has long survived an onslaught from a mighty foe.
By saying that England has survived the "siege of watery Neptune," Shakespeare is saying England has previously withstood great threats.
Answer: No, the ending of the story is not a valid and justifiable one. The story ends with the doctor's verdict of Louise Mallard's cause of death – she died of joy. ... After she gets the news of her husband's death in a railroad disaster, she is devastated.
Explanation:
I’m smart plz give brainlest
